On 06/19/2011 22:47, Paul Vixie wrote:
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:32:59 -0700
From: Doug Barton<do...@dougbarton.us>
... the highly risk-averse folks who won't unconditionally enable IPv6
on their web sites because it will cause problems for 1/2000 of their
customers.
let me just say that if i was making millions of dollars a day and i had
the choice of reducing that by 1/2000th or not i would not choose to
reduce it. as much as i love the free interchange of ideas i will point
out that commerce is what's paid the internet's bills all these years.
I wasn't using that as an example of them doing something wrong. I've
spoken several places (including here on NANOG) in support of people
doing what they need to do to meet their fiduciary responsibility to
their stakeholders.
My point was simply that there are 2 schools of thought on this issue,
and both are so far out on the poles that meaningful changing of minds
is next to impossible (and arguably, totally unnecessary).
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
