> From [email protected] Tue Jul 12 11:29:29 > 2011 > Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:22:09 -0400 (EDT) > From: Jay Ashworth <[email protected]> > To: NANOG <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Spam? > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Randy Bush" <[email protected]> > > > > Also, where is the reply to header? > > > > still in the garbage, where it belongs > > NANOG, being a traditional, (semi-)public, technical mailing list, has > never had a Reply-to header, and never should. I concur with the people > who assert that adding the Reply-to header formally violates the relevant > RFCs, quite aside from the Real World problems it can (and *has*) caused.
*SIGH* One more "problem" with the 'new system', Messages through it _have_ a Reply-to: header. Set to the putative email of the sender, no less.
