On Jul 13, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Scott Brim wrote: > Cameron: As for ILNP, it's going to be difficult to get from where > things are now to a world where ILNP is not just useless overhead. > When you finally do, considering what it gives you, will the journey > have been worth it? LISP apparently has more benefits, and NPT6 is so > much easier -- particularly if you have rapid adaptation to apparent > address changes, which many apps have and all mobile devices need > already -- sorry but I don't think ILNP is going to make it. You > can't just say "the IETF should pay more attention". I've invited > people to promote it and nobody stepped up.
I think ILNP is a great solution. My concern with it is that the needed changes to TCP and UDP are not likely to happen.
