On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <[email protected]> wrote: > You could ask that they withdraw the prefixes and see if that works?
whois 46.96.0.0 inetnum: 46.96.0.0 - 46.96.39.255 netname: LINKTEL-MAN-ETHERNET-EXTENSION Updated: 2011-03-15 ************* e-mail: [email protected] whois link-telecom.net Domain Name: LINK-TELECOM.NET Creation Date: 16-aug-2011 ************* Would YOU filter announcements from YOUR customer based solely on an email request from [email protected]? The Spamhaus reports appear credible, as does the RIPE registration issue with those prefixes. If I was InterNAP, I think I'd challenge my customer about them. Start of business Monday morning. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
