Hi Oscar, John is right about the NDA. Feel free to reach out to Steve Lacoff, as noted at http://www.comcast.com/dedicatedinternet/
Volume, location, term, etc. are all factors to consider. Steve will be at NANOG if you, or others have questions. Cheers, -ren On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:01 PM, John van Oppen <jvanop...@spectrumnet.us> wrote: > I think all pricing is under NDA for the direct connectivity... we have it, > and I know it is under NDA for us... > > Comcast is in the becoming a tier1 game in a big way so avoiding people who > don't already peer with the is probably a plus if you want great connectivity > to them. The AS paths I would avoid are _3356_7922_ (usually fine, but > subject to the fight de jour between level3 and Comcast) and anything on > _6453_7911_ (subject to being saturated all the time). Last I checked > AS2914 and a few others still only see Comcast via 6453 which made that > sub-optimal. > > > I can send you a AS7922 sales contact if you need it, just hit me up off > list... they also have a good list of info on peeringdb for people to > contact. > > > Thanks, > > John van Oppen > Spectrum Networks AS 11404 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Oscar Caraig [mailto:oscarcar...@safe-mail.net] > Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 10:28 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Pricing for Comcast Connectivity > > List, > > Does anyone have sample pricing for Comcast's Paid Peering > (http://www.comcast.com/dedicatedinternet/) service they'd be able to share? > > Also, are there any transit ISPs to avoid when reaching Comcast? I remember > discussion last winter about Tata being congested, and would like to > understand how common these issues are. I'm preparing to launch a large > video broadcast for the state, so any advice would be appreciated. > > Thank you, > Oscar Caraig > > >