>> From: Randy Bush <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 >> naysayer...) >> Date: February 21, 2011 9:00:50 PM EST >> To: Dan Wing <[email protected]> >> Cc: 'NANOG list' <[email protected]>, 'ARIN-PPML List' <[email protected]> >> >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-donley-nat444-impacts-01 >>> That document conflates problems of NAT444 with problems of NAT44 >>> with problems of bandwidth starvation with problems of CGN. >> >> it may require a delicate palate to differentiate the different flavors >> of <bleep> >> >> randy
sorry, it looks like six months ago i hit reply to a message where ppml was cc:ed. as i was not a ppml subscriber, i presume it did not even make it to the ppml list. randy
