On 11/14/2011 4:21 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote: > For the common good it doesn't matter if the "NAT is good" guys are > right or the "NAT is useless" guys are right, as they both fail to > decrease the numbers of their opposing parts. We must get IPv6 done > for both of them.
Hehehe... depending on your ISPs / transit providers / border technology level, putting critical infrastructure on IPv6[only] might be the safest most unreachable network of all :) Jeff
