On Thursday, December 01, 2011 08:19:51 AM Ray Soucy wrote: > There is a lot of talk about "buggy" systems that are > unable to handle prefixes longer than 64; but I've yet > to encounter one. I imagine if I did it would be > treated as a bug and fixed. So to the question of > supporting different prefix lengths: Yes. You should > support any valid IPv6 prefix length; it takes a few > extra lines of code in the beginning; but will save you > a lot of re-coding in the end.
Exactly. /126's for point-to-points, and /112's for router LAN's here, 6 years and counting. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
