On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 05:23:48 AM Tomas Podermanski wrote: > In that area we also tried to use longer prefixes than > /64, but we had difficulties on some devices. There was > two kind of problems. Some of devices weren't able > properly handle longer prefixes for example in routing > protocols. The second group of devices tries to solve > processing longer prefixes via software. So we had to > gave up of using longer prefixes and now we uses 64-bit > prefixes including point to point links (and hope that > nothing will happen). But fact is that was 3 years ago, > so maybe today the situation is much better. I haven't > check for long time.
Interesting. Would you be able to tell us what kit that was, if possible? Also, is this something those vendors can fix in software, or it's a hardware restriction? Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
