Surely something is better than nothing. Advertise the /24's and the /25's, see what happens.
At the least it's a step forwards until you get their routes filtered. Tony On 31 January 2012 18:22, Kelvin Williams <kwilli...@altuscgi.com> wrote: > Upstream requirements. Additionally, I don't believe it would do us any > good. If they're announcing /24 now, why would they not announce a /25. > On Jan 31, 2012 1:19 PM, "Grant Ridder" <shortdudey...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > What is keeping you from advertising a more specific route (i.e /25's)? > > > > -Grant > > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Kelvin Williams < > kwilli...@altuscgi.com>wrote: > > > >> Greetings all. > >> > >> We've been in a 12+ hour ordeal requesting that AS19181 (Cavecreek > >> Internet > >> Exchange) immediately filter out network blocks that are being > advertised > >> by ASAS33611 (SBJ Media, LLC) who provided to them a forged LOA. > >> > >> The routes for networks: 208.110.48.0/20, 63.246.112.0/20, and > >> 68.66.112.0/20 are registered in various IRRs all as having an origin > AS > >> 11325 (ours), and are directly allocated to us. > >> > >> The malicious hijacking is being announced as /24s therefore making > route > >> selection pick them. > >> > >> Our customers and services have been impaired. Does anyone have any > >> contacts for anyone at Cavecreek that would actually take a look at > ARINs > >> WHOIS, and IRRs so the networks can be restored and our services back in > >> operation? > >> > >> Additionally, does anyone have any suggestion for mitigating in the > >> interim? Since we can't announce as /25s and IRRs are apparently a pipe > >> dream. > >> > >> -- > >> Kelvin Williams > >> Sr. Service Delivery Engineer > >> Broadband & Carrier Services > >> Altus Communications Group, Inc. > >> > >> > >> "If you only have a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail." -- > >> Abraham Maslow > >> > > > > >
