On 2/8/12 08:59 , keith tokash wrote: > > Hi, I've done it either way, I prefer to put the v6 peers in a different group than the v4 peers so that I can group the policies at the group rather than neighbor level.
> I'm prepping an environment for v6 and I'm wondering what, if > any, benefit there is to splitting v4 and v6 into separate groups. > We're running Junipers and things are fairly neat and ordered; we have > multiple links to a few providers in many sites, so we group them and > apply the policies at the group level. We could stick the new v6 > neighbors into the same group and apply the policies at the neighbor > level, or create new groups (i.e. Level3 and Level3v6). > > This > might sound a little nit-picky, but I'm concerned that there's a nuance > I'm not thinking of right now and I don't want to be "that guy" who puts > something in place and is cursed for a decade. > > Thanks, > Keith Tokash >