I would be happy if it was Juniper or Cisco ish. Right now it's just total crap :)
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brandon Kim Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:14 AM To: [email protected]; Blake Pfankuch; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: nanog group Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow Never messed around with Juniper.... > From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > CC: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:53:43 +0000 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brandon Kim > > [mailto:[email protected]]<mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]> > > Sent: 14 February 2012 15:51 > > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > Cc: nanog group > > Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow > > > > > > I've been using 5.8 with no problems thus far. As for the CLI, yes it > > is CLUNKY. > > > > But they are completely revamping it, it will be very similar to Cisco > > in the near future... > > Why do people like to base their CLIs on the really rather awful Cisco style > interface rather than something with some more structure like Juniper? > > > -- > Leigh Porter > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com > ______________________________________________________________________
