He.net tunnels are also good to have because depending on your provider, there's still many with incomplete views of the ipv6 routing table and he might have a path. This is a more prevalent issue with ipv6 than v4 at the moment. On Apr 11, 2012 2:03 PM, "Anurag Bhatia" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Seth > > > I just did a test from Eu based server sitting below EU based HE Tunnel > node by downloading Ubuntu release file from US based server. This does not > tells about possible high speed but surely tells what is available atleast. > Server itself is sitting on M-Online with 100Mbps pipe. > > > > > IPv4: > > traceroute to mirror.anl.gov (146.137.96.7), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets > 1 gw.giga-dns.com (91.194.90.1) [AS51167] 16.876 ms 16.925 ms 16.915 > ms > 2 host-93-104-204-33.customer.m-online.net (93.104.204.33) [AS8767] > 1.166 ms 1.449 ms 1.445 ms > 3 xe-2-1-0.rt-decix-1.m-online.net (212.18.6.162) [AS8767] 8.889 ms > 8.888 ms 8.880 ms > 4 20gigabitethernet4-3.core1.fra1.he.net (80.81.192.172) [AS6695] > 18.586 > ms 19.831 ms 19.824 ms > 5 10gigabitethernet1-4.core1.par2.he.net (184.105.213.162) [AS6939] > 18.794 ms 18.789 ms 10gigabitethernet2-2.core1.par2.he.net (72.52.92.26) > [AS6939] 18.437 ms > 6 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.par2.he.net (184.105.213.90) [AS6939] > 18.507 ms 10gigabitethernet7-1.core1.ash1.he.net (184.105.213.93) > [AS6939] > 96.880 ms 97.345 ms > 7 esnet.gigabitethernet4-15.core1.ash1.he.net (216.66.70.18) [AS6939] > 95.544 ms 10gigabitethernet7-1.core1.ash1.he.net (184.105.213.93) > [AS6939] > 97.616 ms esnet.gigabitethernet4-15.core1.ash1.he.net (216.66.70.18) > [AS6939] 95.354 ms > 8 washcr1-te-eqxashrt1.es.net (134.55.221.145) [AS293] 97.835 ms > esnet.gigabitethernet4-15.core1.ash1.he.net (216.66.70.18) [AS6939] > 95.727 > ms washcr1-te-eqxashrt1.es.net (134.55.221.145) [AS293] 98.492 ms > 9 washcr1-te-eqxashrt1.es.net (134.55.221.145) [AS293] 98.463 ms > washsdn1-sdn2-washcr1.es.net (134.55.220.54) [AS293] 110.668 ms 110.641 > ms > 10 starsdn1-ip-washsdn2.es.net (134.55.218.65) [AS293] 120.357 ms > 120.844 ms washsdn1-sdn2-washcr1.es.net (134.55.220.54) [AS293] 110.834 > ms > 11 starcr1-ip-starsdn1.es.net (134.55.219.25) [AS293] 164.788 ms > 164.548 > ms 164.550 ms > 12 starcr1-ip-starsdn1.es.net (134.55.219.25) [AS293] 164.758 ms > anlmr2-starcr1.es.net (134.55.219.53) [AS293] 128.288 ms 128.286 ms > 13 guava-esnet.anchor.anl.gov (192.5.170.77) [AS683] 117.532 ms > anlmr2-starcr1.es.net (134.55.219.53) [AS293] 128.263 ms > guava-esnet.anchor.anl.gov (192.5.170.77) [AS683] 117.500 ms > 14 * guava-esnet.anchor.anl.gov (192.5.170.77) [AS683] 117.687 ms > 117.858 ms > 15 * * * > 16 * * * > 17 * * * > 18 * * * > > > root@server7:/home/anurag/tmp# wget -4 > > http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs/ubuntu/12.04/beta-2/ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso > --2012-04-11 21:56:46-- > > http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs/ubuntu/12.04/beta-2/ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso > Resolving mirror.anl.gov... 146.137.96.7 > Connecting to mirror.anl.gov|146.137.96.7|:80... connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK > Length: 1644474368 (1.5G) [application/octet-stream] > Saving to: `ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso.1' > > > 100%[============================================================================================================================>] > 1,644,474,368 4.78M/s in 5m 38s > > 2012-04-11 22:02:25 (4.64 MB/s) - `ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso.1' saved > [1644474368/1644474368] > > > > > > > > > IPv6: > > > traceroute to mirror.anl.gov (2620:0:dc0:1800:214:4fff:fe7d:1b9), 30 hops > max, 80 byte packets > 1 2001:470:25:78f::1 (2001:470:25:78f::1) [AS6939] 18.918 ms 21.147 ms > 23.357 ms > 2 gige-g2-20.core1.zrh1.he.net (2001:470:0:11d::1) [AS6939] 23.341 ms > 23.324 ms 23.797 ms > 3 10gigabitethernet5-1.core1.fra1.he.net (2001:470:0:21c::1) [AS6939] > 29.781 ms 30.252 ms 23.671 ms > 4 10gigabitethernet5-3.core1.lon1.he.net (2001:470:0:1d2::1) [AS6939] > 37.897 ms 37.880 ms 43.095 ms > 5 10gigabitethernet7-4.core1.nyc4.he.net (2001:470:0:128::1) [AS6939] > 104.552 ms 105.763 ms 105.742 ms > 6 10gigabitethernet2-3.core1.ash1.he.net (2001:470:0:36::1) [AS6939] > 113.963 ms 114.467 ms 111.478 ms > 7 > lawrence-berkeley-national-laboratory.gigabitethernet4-15.core1.ash1.he.net > (2001:470:1:27f::2) > [AS6939] 109.467 ms 109.452 ms 109.435 ms > 8 washcr1-te-eqxashrt1.es.net (2001:400:0:15a::1) [AS293] 115.929 ms > 113.625 ms 115.896 ms > 9 washsdn1-sdn2-washcr1.es.net (2001:400:0:e0::2) [AS293] 114.606 ms > 112.068 ms 112.045 ms > 10 starsdn1-ip-washsdn2.es.net (2001:400:0:ab::1) [AS293] 126.783 ms > 130.008 ms 126.747 ms > 11 starcr1-ip-starsdn1.es.net (2001:400:0:a2::2) [AS293] 127.268 ms > 124.223 ms 124.125 ms > 12 anlmr2-starcr1.es.net (2001:400:0:c0::1) [AS293] 128.066 ms 130.529 > ms 130.513 ms > 13 2001:400:2202:8::2 (2001:400:2202:8::2) [AS293] 130.976 ms 128.915 ms > 128.892 ms > 14 * * * > 15 * * * > > > > > > > > > root@server7:/home/anurag/tmp# wget -6 > > http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs/ubuntu/12.04/beta-2/ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso > --2012-04-11 21:45:52-- > > http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs/ubuntu/12.04/beta-2/ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso > Resolving mirror.anl.gov... 2620:0:dc0:1800:214:4fff:fe7d:1b9 > Connecting to mirror.anl.gov|2620:0:dc0:1800:214:4fff:fe7d:1b9|:80... > connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK > Length: 1644474368 (1.5G) [application/octet-stream] > Saving to: `ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso' > > > 100%[============================================================================================================================>] > 1,644,474,368 *3.66M/s in 6m 11s* > > 2012-04-11 21:52:04 (4.22 MB/s) - `ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso' saved > [1644474368/1644474368] > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Seth Mos <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Op 11 apr 2012, om 20:16 heeft Anurag Bhatia het volgende geschreven: > > > > > Also, does it makes sense to go for BGP Tunnel for now? I just setup > IPv6 > > > Tunnel via Hurricane Electric. Latency seems pretty much OK ~ 10-15ms > of > > > overhead. Yet to test other parameters. I heard Tunnels are usually > bad. > > > Can someone tell how to test this tunnel setup to confirm if there is a > > > performance issue or not? I am thinking of writing a quick bash script > > and > > > run via cron to test latency, packet loss and bandwidth throughput for > > > couple of days. If anyone has better idea, please let me know. > > > > Also using a HE.net BGP tunnel for our IPv6, simply because having just 1 > > native provider with Ipv6 isn't redundant. That and it's 8mbit. > > > > The v4 connection which the tunnel connects over is 90mbit, and the > tunnel > > needs to travel from NL to DE for the FRA BGP peering. > > > > I'm getting about 40mbit through the IPv6 tunnel, so i'd say it works > > well, although the throughput has slowly been dropping to the 30's range > > over the last 6 months. But that's probably because of the latency. > > > > For something that is provided for free I'm really glad we have it. > > > > I should have peered with their UK PoP as it's much closer by latency, > > thus faster. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Seth > > > > > > -- > > Anurag Bhatia > anuragbhatia.com > or simply - http://[2001:470:26:78f::5] if you are on IPv6 connected > network! > > Twitter: @anurag_bhatia <https://twitter.com/#!/anurag_bhatia> > Linkedin: http://linkedin.anuragbhatia.com >
