On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Jay Ashworth <[email protected]> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Jay Ashworth" <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD > > I see that LWN has already spotted this; smb will no doubt be pleased to > know that the very first reply suggests that RFC 3514 solves the problem > much more easily.
In the domain business we don't need a new RFC to know that everything that is evil will end in .evil, and everything else is not evil. No need to define a new bitmask field. Rubens
