On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: > hi etaoin, > >> I still don't want single sign on. Not anywhere. > > i believe that 'single sign on' is a bad deal and dangerous for all, not > just we geeks. essentially it means that the 'identiry provider' owns > your identity. i love that they call themselves 'identity providers' > when it is MY fracking identity and they are reselling it.
so... now that this can is open, has anyone looked at: <http://www.oneid.com/> they seem to have some interesting options for better authentication. > the 'single sign on' i encourage for the end using human beings i > support is 1password and its ilk. it provides the user with one sign-on > yet strongly encourages separation of identities and strong passwords > for sites. the oneid people would say: "it is still a shared secret" -chris
