On Jun 28, 2012, at 10:35 PM, Joel Maslak <[email protected]> wrote:
> Which is why enterprises generally shouldn't use RFC1918 IPs for > servers when clients are located on networks not controlled by the > same entity. Servers that serve multiple administration domains (such > as VPN users on AT&T - or on some random home Linksys box) probably > shouldn't be addressed using addresses that conceivably could be used > at the other end. But I'm probably fighting a losing battle saying > that... I've worked at places that do some combination of all public, all private and a mix.. Usually the places that work best have all public as they avoid mtu and other issues that arise. I expect the enterprise world to start coming around in the years to come to understand how they have damaged networking for the companies. - Jared
