<bashes head against wall> Thank you all. It's not the protocol that hurts. It's rethinking the culture/philosophy around it.
-Hammer- On 7/14/12 3:20 PM, "Owen DeLong" <[email protected]> wrote: >They're a bad thing in IPv6. > >The only place for security through obscurity IMHO is a small round >container that sits next to my desk. > >Besides, if you don't advertise it, a GUA prefix is just as obscure as a >ULA prefix and provides a larger search space in which one has to hunt >for it... Think /3 instead of /8. > >Owen > >On Jul 14, 2012, at 1:14 PM, -Hammer- wrote: > >> Guys, >> The whole purpose of this is that they do NOT need to be global. >> Security thru obscurity. It actually has a place in some worlds. Does >>that >> make sense? Or are such V4-centric approaches a bad thing in v6? >> >> On 7/13/12 8:41 PM, "Brandon Ross" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Owen DeLong wrote: >>> >>>> On Jul 13, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >>>> >>>>> keep life simple. use global ipv6 space. >>>>> >>>>> randy >>>> >>>> Though it is rare, this is one time when I absolutely agree with >>>>Randy. >>> >>> It's even more rare for me to agree with Randy AND Owen at the same >>>time. >>> >>> -- >>> Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM: >>> BrandonNRoss >>> +1-404-635-6667 ICQ: >>> 2269442 >>> Schedule a meeting: https://tungle.me/bross Skype: >>> brandonross >>> >> >> >
