I was wondering if there is a repository with references of prefix
hijack cases.
We would like to use such information for a BGP anomaly detection
analysis that we are carrying out in our research centre.
Unfortunately, apart from the well known cases (Youtube-Pakistan case in
2008 and the China case in 2010, neither of which is an actual hijack,
since they both took place due to misconfigurations and not due to
malicious cyber attacks) there is lack of ground truth information that
can be used for the validation of our techniques.
Thank you very much in advance,
George
.
On 4/9/2012 11:34 ??, Schiller, Heather A wrote:
It does not sound as though the original holders of the space know/care - if
they are out of business, they probably don't care. If they are actively
involved in it, then it's not a hijack. If they haven't updated their company
name/website, then it's not a hijack, just poor record keeping.
If you suspect the address space is abandoned, or hijacked, report it to RIPE.
It may not get deallocated and reassinged until a few months after the bill
stops getting paid.
--Heather
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeroen van Aart [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 2:39 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: 91.201.64.0/22 hijacked?
The below email exchange may be of interest to some of you. The practical upshot is that
it appears "the 91.201.64.0/22 range was hijacked and should be included into the
DROP list".
As an interesting aside, quoting a friend:
"the original company (that performed dangerous waste utilization) may have been a shady thing in and of
itself (..) what most companies calling themselves "ecoservice" (with variations) do is take money
for "safe utilisation" of hazardous waste, and then dump it in some old quarry out in the remote
(or not so remote) corner of a forest or other natural area (..) they always have criminal links and
protection from corrupts officials (often co-owners) and security/law enforcement services"
From: Jeroen van Aart
there is
nothing but crap coming from 91.201.64.0/24. Amongst other things
attempts to spam (through) wordpress sites.
inetnum: 91.201.64.0 - 91.201.67.255
netname: Donekoserv
descr: DonEkoService Ltd
Don - name of the nearby large river.
"EkoService" means ecological service.
country: RU
org: ORG-DS41-RIPE
person: Haralevich Piotr
address: novocherkassk, ul stremyannaya d.6
mnt-by: MNT-DONECO
phone: +74951000000
nic-hdl: HP2220-RIPE
changed: [email protected] 20101117
The company performed dangerous waste utilization:
http://donekoservis.alloy.ru/contacts/
http://www.idbo.ru/view/72321/
But domains donecoserv.ru and donekoservis.ru don't exist anymore.
traceroute 91.201.64.14
...
11 router02.spbbm18.ru.edpnet.net (212.71.11.26) 65.979 ms 65.971 ms
66.182 ms
12 77.109.110.62.static.edpnet.net (77.109.110.62) 88.868 ms 47.809 ms 47.715ms
13 195.2.240.234 (195.2.240.234) 48.235 ms 48.546 ms 48.664 ms
14 ajursrv.parohod.biz (95.215.0.206) 47.957 ms 47.752 ms 47.606 ms
15 mail.rx-helps.com (91.201.64.14) 48.206 ms 48.302 ms 48.237 ms
SPb (Sankt-Peterburg) is 1500 km from Novocherkassk.
parohod.biz also is in Sankt-Peterburg, they offer SEO (which I consider fraud,
spamming websites and search engines).
Also, see
http://support.clean-mx.de/clean-mx/[email protected]&response=
http://www.spambotsecurity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=795
http://unapprovedpharmacy.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/whois-www-canadianmedsshop-com/
| January 3, 2011
...
| inetnum: 91.201.64.0 91.201.67.255
| netname: Donekoserv
| descr: DonEkoService Ltd
| country: RU
| org: ORG-DS41-RIPE
...
| organisation: ORG-DS41-RIPE
| org-name: DonEko Service
| org-type: OTHER
| address: novocherkassk, ul stremyannaya d.6
| e-mail: [email protected]
Note "bulletproof".
Therefore, the 91.201.64.0/22 range was hijacked and should be included into
the DROP list.
