> If a relying party's use of PKI infrastructure legally equated to > acceptance of the relying party agreement (RPA), then having an > explicit record of acceptance of the RPA would not be necessary. > > Alas, it does not appear possible to equate use of PKI certificates > with agreement to the associated RPA (and some might argue that this > is a feature, as some folks would not want to be legally bound to an > agreement which they did not explicitly review and accept.)
do you have a r&d group devoted to how much you can delay, damage, warp, half-assed implement, ... rpki? look around you at the real world, the other rirs (especiall ripe/ncc), etc. the only part of it where arin seems to be doing a serious job is bs generation. thanks. randy