On Sep 19, 2012, at 9:58 PM, Jimmy Hess <mysi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is still no technical reason that 240/4 cannot be > rehabilitated, other than continued immaterial objections to doing > anything at all with 240/4, and given the rate of IPv6 adoption thus > far, if not for those, it could possibly be reopened as unicast IPv4, > and be well-supported by new equipment, before the percentage of > IPv6-enabled network activity reaches a double digit percentage... Excellent idea. Now build a time machine, go back to 2005, and start work. It will be somewhat less relevant of a solution by 2019, which is about when you finish if you start today... The market window is closed. George William Herbert Sent from my iPhone
