My customer the Dark Matter local galaxy group beg to disagree; just because you cannot see them does not mean that you cannot feel them gravitationally.
Or route to them. George William Herbert Sent from my iPhone On Sep 28, 2012, at 10:31 PM, "John R. Levine" <jo...@iecc.com> wrote: >> You won't have enough addresses for Dark Matter, Neutrinos, etc. Atoms >> wind up using up about 63 bits (2^10^82) based on the current SWAG. The >> missing mass is 84% of the universe. > > Fortunately, until we find it, it doesn't need addresses. > >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com] >>> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 8:30 PM >>> To: John Levine >>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org >>> Subject: Re: IPv6 Ignorance >>> >>>> In technology, not much. But I'd be pretty surprised if the laws of >>>> arithmetic were to change, or if we were to find it useful to assign >>>> IP addresses to objects smaller than a single atom. >>> >>> we assign them /64s > > Regards, > John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for > Dummies", > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly >
