Of all the problems CGN creates, I would think that latency is in the noise compared to the other issues.
Owen On Oct 7, 2012, at 1:56 PM, George Herbert <george.herb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ancedotally, for users of an e-gadget company's website, cellphone > company's outbound web proxies, internet games company, and > image-intensive home furnishings website, the CGNs delivered content > faster than the main website could, regardless of increasing its > bandwidth. Latency problems with the CGNs were less than the main > websites' latency problems, on the average. > > There were days that was not true, and days we had to re-re-re-reset > the CGN contents, and the day the @#$#@$% game programmers screwed up > the CGN calls, but on the whole it was among the least performance > limiting / impeding features of the sites in question. > > > -george > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Tom Limoncelli <t...@whatexit.org> wrote: >> Have there been studies on how much latency CGN adds to a typical >> internet user? I'd also be interested in anecdotes. >> >> I've seen theoretical predictions but by now we should have >> measurements from early-world deployments. >> >> Thanks, >> Tom >> >> -- >> Speaking at MacTech Conference 2012. http://mactech.com/conference >> http://EverythingSysadmin.com -- my blog >> http://www.TomOnTime.com -- my videos >> > > > > -- > -george william herbert > george.herb...@gmail.com