On Nov 20, 2012, at 08:45 , Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a > number > of reasons.
AMS-IX publishes stats too: <https://stats.ams-ix.net/sflow/> This is probably a better view of overall percentage on the Internet than a specific company's content. It shows order of 0.5%. Why do you think Google's numbers are lower than the real total? -- TTFN, patrick > On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Aaron Toponce <aaron.topo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Tomas Podermanski wrote: >>> It seems that today is a "big day" for IPv6. It is the very first >>> time when native IPv6 on google statistics >>> (http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some >>> might say it is tremendous success after 16 years of deploying IPv6 :-) >> >> And given the rate on that graph, we'll hit 2% before year-end 2013. >> >> -- >> . o . o . o . . o o . . . o . >> . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o >> o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o > >