On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:01:54PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > implementation would not have been accepted. The result would be a draft > that would never be adopted and so it is back to start.
"Adopted" by whom? The procedure, even at the time, did not require in any way IETF consensus. Getting a number requires that you tell others what is going on, not that you justify the going on itself. > Did you ever read any of the IETF mailing lists and looked at the email > addresses of those people pushing the hardest? At least in the ones I'm > subscribed to the bias is obvious. I think that _ad hominem_ arguments are fallacious, and should be dismissed as such. A -- Andrew Sullivan Dyn Labs [email protected]
