On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:25 PM, <bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
> > because you would not accept a /30 cutout of the UMD /16 coming > from some random IX in Singapore. (see Joe Ableys post earlier > today > on why legacy nodes are / have renumbered.) > > /bill > Agreed on the routing (although I wouldn't ever expect to see the subnet encompassing a root server IP advertised in the wild with..anything even close to 30 bits), and understood on the minimal/non-existant operational impacts. Guess I'm just being curious.