Hi all, Atrato / 5580 here.
We don't have direct peering with AS26347, although we learn the AS26347 prefixes through the 206.223.143.253 (AS 19996) routeserver in LAX. So in a sense we are peering :-) Kind regards, Job On Jan 11, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Andree Toonk <andree+na...@toonk.nl> wrote: > Hi Kenneth, > > .-- My secret spy satellite informs me that at 2013-01-11 8:54 AM > Kenneth McRae wrote: >> Thanks for that info Andree. The only valid peer I see on the list >> would be HE. We do not peer with any of the others listed. > > Could it be these ASns receive your routes via an IX route-server? > > Below some examples that show a peering between 26347 and > 5580 as well as 12989 > > 5580 26347 > http://www.ris.ripe.net/cgi-bin/lg/index.cgi?rrc=RRC031&query=12&arg=5580+26347 > > 12989 26347: > http://www.ris.ripe.net/cgi-bin/lg/index.cgi?rrc=RRC031&query=12&arg=12989+26347 > > And route views: > > route-views>sh ip bgp regex 12989_26347 > BGP table version is 427410275, local router ID is 128.223.51.103 > Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - > internal, > r RIB-failure, S Stale > Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete > > Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path > * 64.111.96.0/19 208.74.64.40 0 19214 12989 > 26347 i > * 66.33.192.0/19 208.74.64.40 0 19214 12989 > 26347 i > * 67.205.0.0/18 208.74.64.40 0 19214 12989 > 26347 i > * 69.163.128.0/17 208.74.64.40 0 19214 12989 > 26347 i > * 75.119.192.0/19 208.74.64.40 0 19214 12989 > 26347 i > * 173.236.128.0/17 208.74.64.40 0 19214 12989 > 26347 i > * 205.196.208.0/20 208.74.64.40 0 19214 12989 > 26347 i > * 208.97.128.0/18 208.74.64.40 0 19214 12989 > 26347 i > * 208.113.128.0/17 208.74.64.40 0 19214 12989 > 26347 i > * 208.113.200.0 208.74.64.40 0 19214 12989 > 26347 i > > > > Cheers, > Andree > > > -- AS5580 - Atrato IP Networks
