If only there were some kind of method for Jay to publish which addresses are actually authorized to send mail on behalf of baylink.com (which could then be leveraged by sc1.nanog.org to turn the recommended soft fail into a hard fail and stop this kind of silliness cold)...
Billet:~ rs$ dig +short baylink.com. txt Billet:~ rs$ dig +short baylink.com. spf Billet:~ rs$ -r George Herbert <[email protected]> writes: > All in favor of phonescoop being blacklisted from nanog? Anyone? > Anyone? Buehler? > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Grant Ridder <[email protected]> wrote: >> haha i love the header: >> >> Received: (from nobody@localhost) >> >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Jay Ashworth <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Check this out: >>> >>> http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=11946 >>> >>> This email was sent via Phone Scoop (www.phonescoop.com). The sender >>> thought you might be interested in the page linked above. >>> >>> > > > > -- > -george william herbert > [email protected]
