"Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 full of DLT cartridges."
Owen On Apr 2, 2013, at 11:31 , "Scott Berkman" <sc...@sberkman.net> wrote: > Hey careful, Pigeons have won this fight before: > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8248056.stm > > -----Original Message----- > From: George Herbert [mailto:george.herb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 10:37 PM > To: Jeff Kell > Cc: NANOG > Subject: Re: RFC 1149 > > Packets, shmackets. I'm just upset that my BGP over Semaphore Towers > routing protocol extension hasn't been experimentally validated yet. > > Whoever you are who keeps flying pigeons between my test towers, you can't > deliver packets without proper routing updates! Knock it off long enough > for me to converge the #@$#$@ routing table... > > > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Jeff Kell <jeff-k...@utc.edu> wrote: > >> On 4/1/2013 10:15 PM, Eric Adler wrote: >>> Make sure you don't miss the QoS implementation of RFC 2549 (and >>> make >> sure >>> that you're ready to implement RFC 6214). You'll be highly >>> satisfied >> with >>> the results (presuming you and your packets end up in one of the >>> higher quality classes). >>> I'd also suggest a RFC 2322 compliant DHCP server for devices inside >>> the hurricane zone, but modified by implementing zip ties such that >>> the C47s aren't released under heavy (wind or water) loads. >> >> Actually, given recent events, I'd emphasize and advocate RFC3514 >> (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3514.txt) which I think is LONG overdue >> for adoption. The implementation would forego most of the currently >> debated topics as related to network abuse or misuse :) >> >> Jeff >> >> >> > > > -- > -george william herbert > george.herb...@gmail.com >