The whole custom TLD thing is just a truly awful, awful idea. Oliver
------------------------------------- Oliver Garraux Check out my blog: blog.garraux.net Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Joshua Goldbard <j...@2600hz.com> wrote: > I'm hoping google is doing this for m2m and not human interaction, but I > could be wrong. > > I just envision years of re-educating grandparents and less technical > users and I'm dreading it. > > Cheers, > Joshua > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 11, 2013, at 10:14 AM, "Warren Bailey" < > wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote: > > > I try not to flood Nanog with articles, but I thought I'd ask for some > opinions on this. For the moment, most browsers treat a single line with no > tld as a search request, why have a tld-less tld? Would this not open the > door for others to claim they need a word as a tld (cisco = http://routersor > Al Gore > http://internets), and how would that be handled by most modern(ish) > browsers and devices? > > > > > > > http://m.gizmodo.com/5994354/google-wants-to-create-a-dotless-domain-called-search > > > > > > > > Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device > >
