I took that as path agnostic.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com > wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Phil Fagan <philfa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "In the presence of layer-3 load-balancers, a multiplexed transport has > the > > potential to allow the different data flows, coming and going to a > client, > > to be served on a single server." - Google > > > > I'll drink the juice > > i don't think much juice is required... doesn't that just say that the > same 'flow' will follow the same path through the network? and that > most/all (save a10/yahoo!) loadbalancers just LB based on 5-tuple (at > best)? so keeping things in a single flow/stream/5-tuple will drop > packets from one host deterministicaly on a single other host at the > far side? > -- Phil Fagan Denver, CO 970-480-7618
