>>> i wonder if this is correlated with the high number of probes being >>> behind nats. > > Maybe this provides a bit of insight: > From a test last week from all RIPE Atlas probes to a single "known > good" MTU 1500 host I compared probes where I had both a ping test with > ipv4.len 1020 and ipv4.len 1502. > behind NAT probes: 12% 1020 bytes ping worked while 1502 failed > non-NATted probes: 6% ""
this needs publication on your adventure game of a web site, please. it will seriously 'inform' some discussion going back and forth on ietf lists. randy