Cutler James R <james.cut...@consultant.com> writes: > Does this mean we can all get back to solving real IPv6 deployment and > operations problems?
I sure hope so. :) > I certainly hope you all can finally see which is the better business choice > between: > > 1. Using up to around 10% of IPv6 space to make our network operations > simpler for the next twenty years or more. You're high by more than an order of magnitude. Inasmuch as I don't hail from Chicago, I'm not suggesting actually issuing addresses to people who are dead (Eric's final datapoint). > 2. Continuing to spend time and money on micromanagement of addressing > rather than real customer needs. > > One who cannot properly understand the business decision here perhaps should > not be debating network policies. > > "Strongly worded letter to follow." Indeed. -r
