On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Jared Mauch <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Brandon Galbraith <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> If your flows are a target, or your data is of an extremely sensitive >> nature (diplomatic, etc), why aren't you moving those bits over >> something more private than IP (point to point L2, MPLS)? This doesn't >> work for the VoIP target mentioned, but foreign ministries should most >> definitely not be trusting encryption alone. > > I will ruin someones weekend here, but: > > MPLS != Encryption. MPLS VPN = "Stick a label before the still unencrypted > IP packet".
great, now how do I get a private link? > MPLS doesn't secure your data, you are responsible for keeping it secure on > the wire. but, but,but! they told me it was private!
