How is this considered even remotely relevant to the NANOG list? VoiceOps, I can sort of see...
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Jay Ashworth <[email protected]> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Tim Donahue" <[email protected]> > >> We ported this to an underlying carrier (the guilty party shall remain >> nameless), and according to their engineers they have no option to >> disable the SSC. >> >> I actually have no idea if the call I am making is blocked at the local >> switch for my POTS test line, the LD carrier, or inbound to our ULC (or any >> other part of the path it might have crossed). This information was not >> provided to me in the response from our ULC, but it would be interesting to >> know for future reference where these blocks happen. > > Waitaminnit. > > The calls are being blocked... well, they'd have to be being blocked > *before they get to your gaining carrier, I guess, right? > > That nearly *requires* the code to be in the LERG, so the originating CO > can execute it. We have some people here who know the LERG back and fro; > Paul? Anyone else? You ever heard of this? > > Can you originate a call to that number from a different carrier via > PRI, and see which ISDN error you get back? Or have someone else call > it that way? > > ISDN errors tend to have a bit more data in them. > > I'd do it, but I don't have any PRIs laying around anymore. > > Cheers, > -- jra > -- > Jay R. Ashworth Baylink > [email protected] > Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 > Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII > St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274 >
