On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:24:08 -0800, Michael DeMan said:
> An NTPv5 solution that could be done with NTP services already

Doesn't matter - the same people that aren't upgrading to a correctly
configured NTPv4 aren't going to upgrade to an NTPv5.  No need at all
for a protocol increment (and actually doing that has its own issues).

Attachment: pgpReYols1Oli.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to