I here tell the spoofer project people are looking to improve their data and stats... And reporting. On Feb 5, 2014 1:08 PM, "Livingood, Jason" < jason_living...@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
> Cool, thanks for the pointed. Now if we could get the data by ASN and > publish it on a site like bcp38.info, that would be awesome. > > > > On 2/4/14, 11:03 PM, "Frank Bulk" <frnk...@iname.com> wrote: > > >Here's such a report: > > > >http://spoofer.cmand.org/summary.php > > > >Frank > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Livingood, Jason [mailto:jason_living...@cable.comcast.com] > >Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 6:53 PM > >To: Octavio Alvarez; North American Network Operators' Group > >Subject: Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] > > > >On 2/4/14, 7:48 PM, "Octavio Alvarez" <alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org> wrote: > > > >>What I'm failing to understand, and again, please excuse me if I'm > >>oversimplifying, is what data do you need from researchers, > >>specifically. What specific actionable data would be helpful? Why does > >>the lack of the data prevent you from applying an ACL. > > > >What I am suggesting is that the community at large needs measurement > >data, rather than individual network operators (which already know if they > >do or do not implement BCP38). Only with a long list of operators that DO > >prevent spoofing and a list of those that DO NOT, backed up with a decent > >data set (enough measurement points, enough measurement tests, across > >enough time, with an openly shared methodology), can the community start > >to encourage non-adopters to change their position. Just my two cents > >though... > > > >Jason > > > > > > > > > > >