On 2/5/14, 1:46 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "joel jaeggli" <joe...@bogus.com> > >>> As I've noted, I'm not sure I believe that's true of current generation >>> gear, and if it *is*, then it should cost manufacturers business. >> >> There are boxes that haven't aged out of the network yet where that's an >> issue, some are more datacenter-centric than others. force10 e1200 was >> one platform that had this limitation for example. > > So making sure manufacturers are producing gear that's BCP38-compliant, > and buyers have it on their tick-list, is still a productive goal, too.
it is... The products are probably close to the end of their sales life, but they'll likely be around for a while. > Cheers, > -- jra >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
