> Daniel is correct, he gets a cookie! The the others: please learn to > recognize when you have no clue.
simon, you just do not understand the purpose of the nanog list > We've been having the same problem here for the last three days. I > tracked it down to BAYES_999. Glad to see other people are suffering > as much as I am. :) as the fix is not yet out, would be cool if someone with more fu than i posted a recipe to hack for the moment. randy
