Got it!
Thankyou very much for help. Have a good weekend ahead. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Doug Barton <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/13/2014 5:23 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > >> If your customers are using BIND there is a flag you can supply to named >>> >to cause it to operate only in IPv4. That would avoid this problem >>> >altogether. >>> >> > > >> And is basically not needed as the IP stack (with the exception of >> Solaris) informs named when there isn't a route to the destination >> and named moves onto the next address to try. >> > > Sure, but by using the flag you skip that step, and the accompanying error > message in the logs. > > The fact that this issue has risen to the level of "annoyance" rather than > just "oddity" as it used to be is actually a good thing. It's a sign that > more and more sites are deploying IPv6 for critical infrastructure. > > Doug > > > -- Anurag Bhatia anuragbhatia.com Linkedin <http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia> Skype: anuragbhatia.com PGP Key Fingerprint: 3115 677D 2E94 B696 651B 870C C06D D524 245E 58E2
