On Mar 24, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Alexander Lopez <[email protected]> wrote:
> not to mention the cost in readdressing your entire network when you change > an upstream provider. > > Nat was a fix to a problem of lack of addresses, however, the use of private > address space 10/8, 192.168/16 has allowed many to enjoy a simple network > addressing scheme. This is easily and better solved in IPv6 using provider independent addressing which is readily available. > Ipv6 requires a complete reeducation of they way we look at routing and the > core of the network. I wouldn’t say complete, but significant. Owen
