On 3/27/2014 7:44 PM, Alexander Neilson wrote:
I wonder if they should be invited to only post a single message with the titles and links to the alerts so that people can follow it up.
Why? Personally, I think it's fine. It only happens (at most) every six months (and sometimes more like a year).
Depends on compliance with the charter for the list but I think it might be nice list etiquette.
I'm surprised at the level of concern over this, considering it's an event that has been going on since before most of those posting about this were even on this list. I'm hoping (in vain, I'm sure) that my gently pointing out that those posts are useful to many people, and that their occurrence predates most of you, will make this non-issue die away (and you make me REALLY MISS srh). While I still worked (I don't now; I'm retired), it was nice to have those alerts, because it could be checked against the *things* *that* *should* *be* *patched* for sanity. Even now, there's still Cisco stuff on my toy network, and I *still* care. Could we just stick to the interesting issues of IPv6, and SMTP, and move on? Please? -- You've confused equality of opportunity for equality of outcomes, and have seriously confused justice with equality. (Woodchuck)
