On 4/9/2014 7:22 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote: > On 4/9/2014 5:11 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:49:27PM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote: >>> >>> The most "sane" out-of-mind response should only be sent *if* the >>> out-of-mind person is named explicitly as a recipient in the RFC822 >>> header. Anything To: somelist@somehost does not qualify :) >>> >>> Jeff >> >> and just how is an algorithm supposed to detect that >> <jeff-k...@utc.edu> is a single human and not a list? > > It is really too bad that there is not place to put a "precedence" > that the software could key on--with values like "bulk" or "junk" or > "list".
Headers of your message include: > Precedence: list > List-Id: North American Network Operators Group <nanog.nanog.org> > List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/options/nanog>, > <mailto:nanog-requ...@nanog.org?subject=unsubscribe> > List-Archive: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/> > List-Post: <mailto:nanog@nanog.org> > List-Help: <mailto:nanog-requ...@nanog.org?subject=help> > List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, > <mailto:nanog-requ...@nanog.org?subject=subscribe> > Errors-To: nanog-bounces+jeff-kell=utc....@nanog.org > Return-Path: nanog-bounces+jeff-kell=utc....@nanog.org Proper mail clients can provide "list links" based on the List- headers, but few if any actually do. So take your pick, but my point remains, it still retains: > Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:22:51 -0500 > From: Larry Sheldon <larryshel...@cox.net> > Organization: Maybe tomorrow > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; > rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 > To: <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: Yahoo DMARC breakage And I'm nowhere mentioned. I only appear in the "envelope RCPT TO:<> RFC821 header", nowhere in the RFC822 header. It's not rocket science if you have headers available (which even Outlook can see, although you have to jump through a few hoops to see them). Jeff Jeff