I think I got you to say "NAT"

Matthew Kaufman

(Sent from my iPhone)

> On Apr 17, 2014, at 7:05 PM, Timothy Morizot <tmori...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Apr 17, 2014 7:52 PM, "Matthew Kaufman" <matt...@matthew.at> wrote:
> >
> > While you're at it, the document can explain to admins who have been 
> > burned, often more than once, by the pain of re-numbering internal services 
> > at static addresses how IPv6 without NAT will magically solve this problem.
> 
> If you're worried about that issue, either get your own end user 
> assignment(s) from ARIN or use ULA internally and employ NAT-PT (prefix 
> translation) at the perimeter. That's not even a hard question.

Reply via email to