On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Simon Perreault <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 2014-04-18 13:25, Mike Hale a écrit : >> I agree with Bill. You can poopoo NAT all you want, but it's a fact >> of most networks and will continue to remain so until you can make a >> compelling case to move away from it. > > Does that mean all IPv6 firewalls should support NAT? > > Remember, we're aiming for a base set of requirements applying to all > IPv6 firewalls.
Your document specifies "Enterprise" firewalls. Frankly I think that's wise. Consumer and enterprise users have very different needs and very different cost points. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
