On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 07:33:45PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote: > On May 7, 2014, at 4:19 PM, Matt Palmer <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 05:57:01PM -0400, David Conrad wrote: > >> However, assume that the OpenBSD developers did document their protocol > >> and requested an IESG action and was refused. Do you believe that would > >> justify squatting on an already assigned number? > > > > I'm going to go with "yes", just to be contrary. At the point that the IESG > > refused to deal with 'em, they've effectively been ostracised from "the > > Internet community", and thus they are under no obligation to act within the > > rules and customs of that community. > > I don’t believe for one second that the IESG refused to deal with ‘em.
Neither do I. That wasn't the question I was answering, though -- the scenario described was "assume that...". - Matt
