Richard: While you & I don't have the best relationship ever, I would not - and did not - do anything of the sort. I'm a little more, let's say, blunt about my displeasures. You don't have to believe me, but those are the facts.
Also, just to be clear again, I have zero problem with pointing out the impersonation, I was questioning the "speculators" part. I.e. You implied you would not send that, and I wondered why you wouldn't. But since you think it is off-topic (and I did not), that's a perfectly valid reason not to send such posts. Thank you for clearing it up. -- TTFN, patrick On Jun 06, 2014, at 20:24 , Richard Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: > I wanted the NANOG community to know that someone is impersonating me. I > don't send off-topic links from dodgy blogs to email lists. > > I now have a pretty good idea as to who the impersonator is; it seems that > Gilmore has too much time on his hands. > > RB > > On 6/6/14, 5:06 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: >> I believe I listed 3. >> >> And there are multiple times I have posted similar items in the past. >> >> Just curious about the "speculators" thing. But I think we're off-topic, so >> apologies to the audience for extra email in their inboxes. I've sent >> reply-to to my personal address to avoid this blowing up (although I don't >> know if mailman will respect that). >> > > -- > Richard Bennett > Visiting Fellow, American Enterprise Institute > Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy > Editor, High Tech Forum >
