Well my routing isn't nearly that bad.  I haven't been able to get confirmation 
but support said they are probably just routing around a problem and they can't 
get any direct feedback form network engineers. 

I should get an update tomorrow hopefully.  I'm also seeing some bandwidth 
issues on charters internal network.  Something must be going on.

Best to have up and go get some Bells :)

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 15, 2014, at 7:10 PM, Rusty Dekema <rdek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Are you still seeing odd routing with Charter in Wisconsin? Charter's routing 
> in Michigan seems to be going pretty crazy at the moment as well. 
> 
> The following traceroute is from a Charter residential line* in Kalamazoo MI 
> to a Comcast business (DOCSIS) line in Ypsilanti MI, by way of several 
> unknown hops, some of which are in RFC 1918 space, Sprintlink possibly in 
> Fort Worth TX, another unknown hop, then Comcast Dallas TX, Comcast Marietta 
> GA, Comcast Ashburn VA, then finally Comcast MI. Needless to say, this is not 
> the normal route:
> 
>     http://pastebin.com/9CKmea6M
> 
> Tracing the same route but in the other direction also yields odd results. 
> The route proceeds normally to a Comcast ibone router in 350 E. Cermak 
> (Chicago IL), but the very next hop after that router is the public IP of the 
> Charter service in Kalamazoo MI as follows:
> 
>     http://pastebin.com/VCCgnUsn
> 
> For what it's worth, if anyone could explain to me what might cause that 
> behavior (between hops 8 and 9), I would really appreciate the knowledge.
> 
> The routing between that same Charter residential service and a Merit/Michnet 
> endpoint in southeast Michigan is also odd, taking a detour through Virginia 
> [xe-8-3-0.1018.asbn0.tr-cps.internet2.edu (198.71.47.25)], which it does not 
> normally do. The routing in that case does appear to be the same regardless 
> of which side you initiate the traceroute from.
> 
> Cheers,
> Rusty Dekema
> 
> 
> * The Charter residential line's IP address is currently reverse resolving to 
> a Charter DHCP pool in Bay City, MI, which is over 100 miles from Kalamazoo. 
> This is also unusual. The Charter service in question is now and has always 
> been located in Kalamazoo MI.     
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Mikeal Clark <mikeal.cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hoping someone auditing the list can provide some insight or a back
>> channel support option.
>> 
>> I started having some good latency spikes last night, which have
>> continued this morning, so I finally took a look at things and I am
>> seeing a lot more routing than I expected.  Support is telling me this
>> is normal but I don't remember this many replies on traceroute.  My
>> speeds are about 1/5 the normal as well this morning and seeing some
>> dropped packets even using a test sight inside Charter's network.
>> This is just business cable so my support options are pretty limited.
>> 
>> 4    10 ms    14 ms    13 ms
>> dtr01shbywi-tge-0-3-0-23.shby.wi.charter.com [96.34.24.178]
>>   5    18 ms    11 ms    17 ms  dtr01wbndwi-bue-2.wbnd.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.30.17]
>>   6    12 ms    11 ms    11 ms  dtr02wbndwi-bue-1.wbnd.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.24.56]
>>   7    17 ms    11 ms    11 ms  dtr02fdulwi-bue-3.fdul.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.30.19]
>>   8    13 ms    18 ms    18 ms  dtr01fdulwi-bue-1.fdul.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.19.144]
>>   9    19 ms    14 ms    15 ms  crr03fdulwi-bue-2.fdul.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.20.8]
>>  10    30 ms    22 ms    35 ms  crr02euclwi-bue-6.eucl.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.22.240]
>>  11    23 ms    22 ms    43 ms  bbr02euclwi-bue-4.eucl.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.2.6]
>>  12    22 ms    34 ms    19 ms  bbr01euclwi-bue-5.eucl.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.0.6]
>>  13    34 ms    30 ms    38 ms
>> bbr01stcdmn-tge-0-0-0-3.stcd.mn.charter.com [96.34.0.115]
>>  14    42 ms    43 ms    52 ms  65.46.47.77
>>  15    78 ms    78 ms    92 ms  ae1d0.mcr2.minneapolis-mn.us.xo.net
>> [216.156.1.86]
>>  16    93 ms    82 ms    82 ms  vb1711.rar3.denver-co.us.xo.net 
>> [216.156.0.173]
>>  17    81 ms    95 ms    82 ms  te-3-0-0.rar3.sanjose-ca.us.xo.net
>> [207.88.12.58]
>>  18    83 ms    82 ms    98 ms  207.88.14.226.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.14.226]
>>  19    81 ms    78 ms    78 ms  216.156.84.6.ptr.us.xo.net [216.156.84.6]
>>  20    77 ms    78 ms    88 ms
>> xe-2-2-0-955.jnrt-edge02.prod1.netflix.com [69.53.225.30]
>>  21    86 ms    78 ms    78 ms  te1-8.csrt-agg02.prod1.netflix.com
>> [69.53.225.10]
>>  22    79 ms    78 ms    82 ms  www.trynetflix.com [69.53.236.17]
>> 
>>   4    12 ms    11 ms     8 ms
>> dtr01shbywi-tge-0-3-0-23.shby.wi.charter.com [96.34.24.178]
>>   5    17 ms    10 ms    12 ms  dtr01wbndwi-bue-2.wbnd.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.30.17]
>>   6    11 ms     9 ms    15 ms  dtr02wbndwi-bue-1.wbnd.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.24.56]
>>   7    15 ms    18 ms    18 ms  dtr02fdulwi-bue-3.fdul.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.30.19]
>>   8    16 ms    14 ms    11 ms  dtr01fdulwi-bue-1.fdul.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.19.144]
>>   9    20 ms    14 ms    15 ms  crr03fdulwi-bue-2.fdul.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.20.8]
>>  10    22 ms    22 ms    18 ms  crr02euclwi-bue-6.eucl.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.22.240]
>>  11    18 ms    22 ms    22 ms  bbr02euclwi-bue-4.eucl.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.2.6]
>>  12    35 ms    30 ms    31 ms  bbr01chcgil-bue-1.chcg.il.charter.com
>> [96.34.0.9]
>>  13    27 ms    27 ms    27 ms  prr01chcgil-bue-2.chcg.il.charter.com
>> [96.34.3.9]
>>  14    27 ms    27 ms    27 ms
>> 96-34-152-30.static.unas.mo.charter.com [96.34.152.30]
>>  15    29 ms    32 ms    27 ms  209.85.244.1
>>  16    27 ms    27 ms    28 ms  209.85.254.238
>>  17    54 ms    40 ms    40 ms  209.85.248.214
>>  18    38 ms    40 ms    38 ms  216.239.43.217
>>  19     *        *        *     Request timed out.
>>  20    44 ms    40 ms    40 ms  google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]
> 

Reply via email to