On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 1:42 PM, George Herbert <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:41 AM, Matthew Petach <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Brett's concerns seem to center around his > > ability to be cost-competitive with the big > > guys in his area...which implies there *are* > > big guys in his area to have to compete with. > > > He 's running wireless links, from web and prior info as I recall. His > key business seems to be outside the cable tv / DSL wire loop ranges from > wire centers. The bigger services seem to have fiber into Laramie, and > Brett seems to have fiber to that Denver exchange pointlet . > > Why he's not getting fiber to a bigger exchange point or better transit is > unclear. > > There are bandwidth reseller / BGP / interconnect specialist ISPs out > there who live to fix these things, if there's anything like a viable > customer base... > Ah--right, that was the genesis of my rant about "if you don't have an ASN, you don't exist". He'd first have to get an ASN before he could engage in getting a different upstream transit, or connect to different exchange points, etc. As much as people insisted you can be an ISP without an AS number, I will note that it's much, MUCH harder, to the point where the ARIN registration fees for the AS number would quickly be recouped by the cost savings of being able to shop for more competitive connectivity options. Matt > > > George William Herbert > Sent from my iPhone >
