There¹s still a lot of websites that are not with the times. No ipv6 on CNN, FOX, or NBC news websites.
Slashdot.org shame on you! Comcast and AT&T work, but not Verizon. No surprise there. Power company nope. I think CGN is fine for 99% of customers out there. Until the iPhone came out Verizon Wireless had natted all their blackberry customers and saved million¹s of IP¹s. Then Apple and Google blew a hole into that plan. Then again I¹m for IPv4 just running out and finally pushing people to adopt. The US Govt has done a better job of moving to IPv6 than private industry which frankly is amazing all things considered. Comcast is pushing over 1TBPS of IPv6 traffic, but I¹m sure that¹s mainly video from Youtube and Netflix. On 7/30/14, 9:45 AM, "Owen DeLong" <[email protected]> wrote: >The only actual residential data I can offer is my own. I am fully dual >stack and about 40% of my traffic is IPv6. I am a netflix subscriber, but >also an amazon prime member. > >I will say that if amazon would get off the dime and support IPv6, it >would make a significant difference. > >Other than amazon and my financial institutions and Kaiser, living >without IPv4 wouldn't actually pose a hardship as near as I can tell from >my day without v4 experiment on June 6. > >I know Kaiser is working on it. Amazon apparently recently hired Yuri >Rich to work on their issues. So that would leave my financial >institutions. > >I think we are probably less than 5 years from residential IPv4 becoming >a service that carries a surcharge, if available. > >Owen > > >> On Jul 29, 2014, at 22:42, Julien Goodwin <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >>> On 29/07/14 22:22, Owen DeLong wrote: >>>> On Jul 29, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Mark Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> In message <[email protected]>, Matt Palmer writes: >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:28:53AM +1200, Tony Wicks wrote: >>>>>> 2. IPv6 is nice (dual stack) but the internet without IPv4 is not a >>>>>>viable >>>>>> thing, perhaps one day, but certainly not today (I really hate >>>>>>clueless >>>>>> people who shout to the hills that IPv6 is the "solution" for >>>>>>today's >>>>>> internet access) >>>>> >>>>> Do you have IPv6 deployed and available to your entire customer >>>>>base, so >>>>> that those who want to use it can do so? To my way of thinking, >>>>>CGNAT is >>>>> probably going to be the number one driver of IPv6 adoption amongst >>>>>the >>>>> broad customer base, *as long as their ISP provides it*. >>>> >>>> Add to that over half your traffic will switch to IPv6 as long as >>>> the customer has a IPv6 capable CPE. That's a lot less logging you >>>> need to do from day 1. >>> >>> That would be nice, but I¹m not 100% convinced that it is true. >>> >>> Though it will be an increasing percentage over time. >>> >>> Definitely a good way of reducing the load on your CGN, with the >>>additional benefit >>> that your network is part of the solution rather than part of the >>>problem. >> >> Being on the content provider side I don't know the actual percentages >> in practice, but in the NANOG region you've got Google/Youtube, NetFlix, >> Akamai & Facebook all having a significant amount of their services v6 >> native. >> >> I'd be very surprised if these four together weren't a majority of any >> consumer-facing network's traffic in peak times.
