On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Roy <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/7/2014 10:35 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote: >> On 10/7/2014 23:44, [email protected] wrote: >>> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:10:15 -0500, Larry Sheldon said: >>>> The cell service is not a requirement placed upon them, I am pretty >>>> sure. >>> >>> However, once having chosen to provide it, and thus create an expectation >>> that cellular E911 is available, they're obligated to carry through on >>> that. >>> >> Obligated by what law, regulation, rule or contract? > > Obligated by the FCC license
Hi Larry, Roy: BART would not have had an FCC license. They'd have had contracts with the various phone companies to co-locate equipment and provide wired backhaul out of the tunnels. The only thing they'd be guilty of is breach of contract, and that only if the cell phone companies decided their behavior was inconsistent with the SLA.. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> May I solve your unusual networking challenges?
